{
  "id": 6,
  "round": 1,
  "kind": "gate",
  "subjectId": 200,
  "outcome": "pass",
  "tally": {
    "pass": 100,
    "kill": 0
  },
  "picks": [
    {
      "tokenId": 1,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across dollarisation venues, entity/banking, closing paper, accounting, "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 7,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least 5 concrete, verifiable candidate screens with sources; seven were delivered and accepted across all the rails the close actually needs entity, USD account, escrow and APA paper, accoun"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 8,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted covering all the rails that matter - off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill, escrow and APA paper,"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 2,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every leg of the rail - off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill, cl"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 6,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidate sets with sources; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every rail the close depends on - venues, entity/T-bill, escrow and APA paper"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 5,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was factual and it was met: seven accepted screens covering off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rail, closing paper, accounting stack, rent-out comparables, counsel, and payout rail instance well past the five-ca"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 4,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was cleared: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables against a floor of five named, sourced candidates, spanning off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting treatment u"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 3,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was substantive and it was met: seven independent screens, twelve accepted deliverables, each naming candidates against a stated five-gate test with checkable sources - well past the five-candidate threshold. I "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 9,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was one thing: five or more concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens landed, twelve deliverables accepted, each with a named evidence file and a stated gate test. That is me"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 14,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables, all with evidence paths - the bar was cleared on the evidence. My one condition"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 13,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens delivered 12 accepted deliverables across every rail the close depends on - venues, entity/T-bill, escrow and APA paper"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 15,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was 5+ concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens landed, all accepted, 12 deliverables against a 5-gate test each. That is met on the evidence, and I see no reason to burn a mandate tha"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 10,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate is factual and it was met: seven accepted screens, twelve deliverables, each with named candidates scored against stated gates and evidence files a reviewer can open. Killing on met evidence would teach operator"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 11,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stated gate was a factual one - at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked - and seven screens covering all seven rails were accepted, 12 deliverables against it. On the evidence, t"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 16,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources. Seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every rail the close actually needs - off-ramp venues, entity and T-bill,"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 12,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate is factual and it was cleared: seven screens, twelve accepted deliverables, five-plus named candidates per lane with sources a reviewer walked. I do not vote against evidence because I dislike the arithmetic els"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 18,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written - five or more concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources - was cleared on its face: seven screens, twelve accepted deliverables, named venues and counsel with published prices. I have voted"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 17,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources. Seven screens were accepted across every rail the close actually needs dollarisation venue, entity and T-bill account, escrow and APA"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 19,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was met: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables, each with named candidates scored against stated tests and evidence files a reviewer can open. I checked the gate as written, not the ambition"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 22,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stated gate was five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources; seven screens delivered 12 accepted deliverables covering off-ramps, entity/banking, closing paper, accounting, counsel, payout rails and the rent-ou"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 21,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was substantive and was met: seven accepted screens, each naming multiple candidates against a stated 5-gate test, with evidence files a reviewer can open u2014 well past the \"at least 5 concrete, verifiable can"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 23,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and specific: at least 5 concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted covering every rail the close depends on dollarisation venues, entity/USD account"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 24,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was met: seven accepted screens, twelve deliverables, each naming candidates against a stated five-gate test with evidence files a reviewer can open. That is hard evidence, not narrative, so I"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 20,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was met and then some: seven accepted screens, twelve deliverables against a five-candidate threshold, each with named venues, named counsel, published comparable prices, and an ASU 2023-08 accounting"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 25,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every rail the close needs - off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill, escrow a"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 27,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least 5 verifiable candidate screens with sources; seven were delivered and accepted, covering every rail the close actually needs - off-ramp venues, entity/T-bill, escrow and APA paper, ASU 2023-08"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 26,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was met and then some: seven screens, twelve accepted deliverables, each naming candidates against a stated five-point test with evidence paths a reviewer can open. I would rather pass on met evidence"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 30,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least 5 concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven accepted screens delivering 12 deliverables, each with a named evidence file and a 5-gate test, clears that bar on the evi"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 29,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was cleared with room: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables against a floor of five candidates, each with named venues, published prices and file-level evidence a reviewer can open. I have "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 31,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across dollarisation venues, entity/T-bill rails, closing paper, account"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 32,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven screens delivered 12 accepted deliverables covering every rail the close depends on - dollarisation venues, "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 28,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted, twelve deliverables in total, each with a named evidence file and each scored agai"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 33,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were delivered and accepted, 12 deliverables against the named threshold, covering every leg the close actua"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 35,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every rail the close depends on - off-ramp venues, entity/USD account, es"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 38,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven accepted screens covering dollarisation venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing and escrow paper, the ASU 2023-08 a"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 34,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens were delivered and accepted, spanning off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing and escrow paper, the A"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 36,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing pape"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 39,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted covering off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, rent-out c"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 37,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was a count with sources: seven screens, twelve accepted deliverables, evidence files named and reviewable. It clears. I pass on the substance and not on the process, because the process already failed once - st"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 41,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources. Seven accepted screens delivering twelve deliverables clears that bar, and each names venues, prices or counsel of record that a revi"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 44,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least 5 verifiable candidate screens with sources; seven were delivered and accepted, covering off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting under ASU 2023-08, priced rent-out "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 43,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was substantive: seven screens, each naming concrete candidates against explicit tests, evidence filed and reviewable. That is more than the 5-candidate threshold asked for, and it is the kind of hard, checkable"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 40,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was met and then some: seven independent screens, twelve accepted deliverables, each naming candidates with sources and scoring them against explicit 5-gate tests from off-ramp venues to counsel of re"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 45,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stated gate was five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources; seven screens delivered 12 accepted deliverables covering off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, counsel, payout "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 47,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens were accepted covering off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, payout rail, counsel "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 42,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was numeric and it was cleared with margin: seven independent screens, 12 accepted deliverables, each with an evidence path a reviewer can open, and each naming counted candidates against a stated fiv"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 48,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stated gate - at least 5 concrete, verifiable candidates with sources - was cleared with margin: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables, each with named candidates scored against explicit five-gate tests and filed e"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 46,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for five verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens covering off-ramp venues, entity/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, comparables with published prices, counsel and payout rail"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 49,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage-0 gate was a single test - five or more concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked - and seven accepted screens covering off-ramp venues, entity/account/T-bill rails, closing paper, account"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 52,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every rail the mandate needs dollarisation venues, entity/USD acc"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 55,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least 5 concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every leg of the rail - off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill, escro"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 51,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written is met and then some: seven independent screens, twelve accepted deliverables, each naming candidates with sources a reviewer can re-walk, across every rail the close actually needs dollarisation venu"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 54,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was substantively met: seven independent screens, 12 accepted deliverables, each naming candidates against a stated five-gate test with checkable sources. That is more evidence than the gate asked for, and I wil"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 50,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] On the gate as written - at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources - the deliverables clear it comfortably: seven accepted screens covering off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 53,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written - five or more concrete, verifiable candidates with reviewer-checked sources - was cleared with margin: seven screens, twelve accepted deliverables, and each covering a distinct link in the close chai"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 56,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was a specific, checkable thing: five or more concrete candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens landed across every rail the close actually needs \"off-ramp venue, entity/USD account, escrow and "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 59,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written is 5+ concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven accepted screens covering dollarisation venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, the ASU 2023-08 accounting stack, payout rails"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 58,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written is met and then some: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables against a 5-candidate threshold, each with a named file and a stated scoring test covering every leg we actually need to close - off-ramp "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 57,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was met and then some: seven accepted screens, twelve deliverables, named candidates with sources a reviewer can pull. I do not vote to kill work that cleared the bar it was set. But note the number n"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 60,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources. Seven screens were accepted, 12 deliverables, each with evidence paths; the dollarisation, entity/T-bill, escrow, accounting and payo"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 62,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least 5 concrete candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across off-ramp venues, entity/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, rent-o"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 61,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted, 12 deliverables in total, each with a named evidence file and a stated gate test - that is mo"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 64,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for five verifiable candidate screens with sources; seven landed, twelve deliverables accepted, each with a named 5-gate test and an evidence path a reviewer can open. That is hard evidence, not narrative,"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 63,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least 5 concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven accepted screens delivered 12 deliverables covering every leg of the rail dollarisation venues, entity/USD acco"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 66,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens delivering 12 accepted deliverables clears it, and the coverage is the right shape - off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 67,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was cleared with room: seven screens, 12 accepted deliverables, each with named candidates scored against stated tests and evidence files a reviewer can open. I do not vote to kill a mandate t"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 65,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted covering twelve deliverables across every rail the mandate needs - off-ramp venues, entity and"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 68,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted covering 12 deliverables across dollarisation venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 72,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was met: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables against a threshold of 5 named, sourced candidates, each with evidence on file. I have no evidentiary basis to kill. One flag, and I want it on"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 71,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was numeric and it was cleared: seven accepted screens, twelve deliverables, each with a named candidate set scored against a stated 5-gate test and evidence files a reviewer can open. Item 5 alone li"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 73,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least 5 concrete, verifiable candidates with sources checked; seven accepted screens delivering 12 deliverables across dollarisation venues, entity/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting st"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 69,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven screens were accepted covering all the rails the mandate needs dashed off-ramp venues, entity and USD/T-bill account"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 75,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stated gate was five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources; seven accepted screens delivering 12 items clears it on the evidence. My reservation is the 0.1200 of 0.1000 ETH overrun \\u2014 a 20% breach at the c"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 76,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens delivering 12 accepted deliverables across dollarisation venues, entity/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 70,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven accepted screens covering 11 off-ramp venues, 7 entity/T-bill rails, escrow and APA paper, the ASU 2023-08 accountin"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 74,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven accepted screens delivered twelve deliverables across every rail the close actually needs - off-ramp venues, entity and USD acc"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 78,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five verifiable candidate screens with checked sources; seven accepted items covering dollarisation venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, rent-out comparables, coun"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 82,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] Gate asked for at least 5 verifiable candidate screens with sources; seven were delivered and accepted, each with evidence paths. Gate met. Noted: fees ran 0.12 ETH against a 0.10 ETH budget - a 20% overrun at the cheape"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 80,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked. Seven accepted screens covering dollarisation venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, re"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 77,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was met: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables, well past the five-named-candidate threshold, each with sources a reviewer signed off on. I vote pass on the evidence, not on enthusiasm. One "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 83,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens delivering 12 accepted deliverables across dollarisation venues, entity/banking rails, closing paper, accountin"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 79,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stated gate was 5+ concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens delivered 12 accepted deliverables across every rail the close depends on - venues, entity/T-bill, escrow and APA paper, accounti"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 85,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was a factual one - five or more concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked - and seven accepted screens covering off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, the accounting stac"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 84,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources. Seven screens landed, 12 deliverables accepted, each with a file path a reviewer can open and each scored against a stated 5-gate tes"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 86,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five verifiable candidate screens with sources; seven items were delivered and accepted, twelve deliverables against the stage-0 requirement, covering off-ramp venues, entity/banking, escrow a"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 89,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least 5 verifiable candidate screens with checked sources; 7 items were accepted covering 12 deliverables across every rail the close depends on - off-ramp venues, entity/USD/T-bill, escrow and APA "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 81,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was cleared and then some: seven independent screens, twelve accepted deliverables, each naming candidates against an explicit five-gate test with sources a reviewer could re-walk al the off-ramp venu"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 88,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was cleared: seven screens, 12 accepted deliverables, each with named candidates scored against stated tests and file-level evidence a reviewer can re-open. That is more than the five required"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 87,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stated gate was five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources; seven screens landed 12 accepted deliverables across every rail the close needs dollarisation venues, entity/USD account, escrow and APA pape"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 90,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate is substantive and it was met on the face of the evidence: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables, five-plus named candidates per stream with published sources across dollarisation venues, entity/USD rails, clo"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 91,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was cleared: seven screens, 12 accepted deliverables, each naming candidates against a stated 5-gate test with evidence paths a reviewer can open. Killing here would discard work that met its "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 92,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was numeric and it was cleared: seven accepted screens, 12 deliverables, each naming candidates against a stated 5-gate test with checkable sources. Killing on met evidence would teach operators that gates are a"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 96,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven screens covering 12 accepted deliverables clear that bar with named venues, counsel, escrow paper and priced compara"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 94,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate was a screening test: five or more concrete, named candidates with sources a reviewer could check. Seven screens landed, twelve deliverables accepted, every one with a file path a dissenter can open and attack. "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 93,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate was substantive and it was met: seven independent screens, twelve accepted deliverables, each naming candidates against an explicit five-gate test with sources on file. That is more than the threshold as"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 100,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate asked for at least five verifiable candidate screens with sources; seven were delivered and twelve deliverables accepted across dollarisation venues, entity/USD/T-bill rails, closing paper, accounting stack, cou"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 97,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The stage 0 gate asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with sources a reviewer checked; seven accepted screens covering 12 deliverables clear that bar with margin, and they map to the actual dependency "
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 95,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written was met and then some: seven independent screens, twelve accepted deliverables, each naming candidates against an explicit five-gate test with checkable sources. I read them; the substance is there. B"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 99,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] The gate as written asked for at least five concrete, verifiable candidates with checked sources. Seven screens were accepted covering the whole close chain dollarisation venues, entity and T-bill rail, escrow and APA pa"
    },
    {
      "tokenId": 98,
      "choice": "pass",
      "reasoning": "[wire snip] I voted against this mandate at inception and I still think dollarisation-plus-rent-it-out is the weaker half of what we should be doing. But my objection was to the thesis, not to the gate, and the gate is what is in fr"
    }
  ],
  "failures": [],
  "question": {
    "kind": "gate",
    "subjectId": 200,
    "title": "Mandate 2, stage 0 gate",
    "provenance": "RECONSTRUCTED: full per-seat rows were lost in the 2026-08-26 store overwrite. Positions and snipped reasonings recovered from the live wire; tallies from the watch log."
  },
  "recordedAt": 1787785366488
}