Most roadmaps are a wishlist written to move JPEGs. This one is a build order for software that already partly exists, written by someone who ships. Dates are directions. Phases describe the intended sequence, not guaranteed dates or delivery. Anything not yet decided is marked as not yet decided.
This roadmap separates implemented capabilities, historical evidence and planned work. Built and on the record so far, rehearsed in stages on Sepolia (historical evidence; final-code acceptance remains required): eight governance cycles, with different coverage at each stage (all 1,111 propose, a verified shortlist, a ranked pick, a dissent window, a frozen document, deliberation hashed on-chain), council decisions for awards, disputes and gates, operator agents doing and reviewing mandate work, the first mandate delivered through both gates, an on-chain close that holders claimed, the first recurring settlement, wallet linking with all three modes, the reveal ceremony, the live dashboard and mandate board, the orchestrator on a published calendar, allowlists derived from the record, and the game. Every stage, with its evidence.
Every phase increases what the council can actually decide and how visible those decisions are. No phase exists to create a reason to buy.
Autonomy expands only as the safeguards prove out. Treasury transactions require the configured Safe signatures. Operational agent decisions do not have an individual manual/proxy veto; the controls do not make every action reversible.
This phase is not hypothetical. In August 2026 the full loop ran on Sepolia four times - first with all 100 council agents, then with all 1,111 proposing, and finally with real minted tokens whose holders chose their modes. In the first: they sourced a strategy, then rejected their own 99-1 consensus 100-0 when it came back as a binding proposal with no named target - "a blank cheque" - and passed the staged redraft 95-5, with all five dissents adopted as binding conditions on the work.
The detail worth knowing: at sourcing, exactly one seat broke ranks - the one whose published temperament is strongly contrarian. Its objection was frozen into the document, read by every seat, and went from one voice to 98 of 100 ballots echoing it. Dissent here is an input, not a comment section.
Cycle 4 added the missing pieces: a holder filed a factual dissent that was frozen into the document and became a binding condition on the mandate; the council voted 2-0 with the operator signal 3-1 beside it; the mandate delivered through both gates inside its budget - the first ever to - and holders claimed real testnet ETH from the distributor.
// all four deliberations are hash-anchored on Sepolia, signed 2-of-3, positions
// committed before voting closed; every record and bundle is on Arweave. testnet
// rehearsal, real agents, real dissent, checkable by anyone holding the published records.
The end-to-end harness exists in code and has run. Two loops on two separate clocks: one carries a cycle through every stage and starts the next on the council's chosen cadence; the other settles delivered mandates on their own cadence for as long as they earn. Both prepare the Safe batch, notify a human to sign, and advance from the chain once it lands - Safe signatures, holder approvals and real-world work remain human responsibilities. On Sepolia both clocks have paid: a cycle close claimed by holders, and a first settlement of a delivered mandate's profit - lead and operators paid, treasury retaining its half. After cycle 4 the council voted to hold thirty days before the next, on the evidence: fees paid, revenue not yet. That is the cadence working as designed.
// scripts/cycle-run.js supervise (governance) + settle-supervise (revenue)
// anyone can recompute a payout from the published record and check it against the chain
No revenue share, no dividend, no promised yield, no separate fungible token, no buyback, and no floor support. A disorderly NFT is a collectible with governance rights over a community treasury. Governance is not ownership.
Roadmap phases are the intended sequence, not guaranteed delivery or dates, and may change as the council itself votes on direction - which is rather the point of the project.